Re: Impeachment teaching, yes.

From: Ron Stoloff (rstoloff@MAIL.PHILA.K12.PA.US)
Date: Mon Dec 21 1998 - 17:41:04 EST


---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Memory Fellows <AMFELLOWS@RS8.LOC.GOV>
Poster: Ron Stoloff <rstoloff@MAIL.PHILA.K12.PA.US>
Subject: Re: Impeachment teaching, yes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At 11:07 AM 12/21/98 -0500, you wrote:
>At 06:00 PM 12/17/1998 -0500, you wrote:
> But if students' lack of
>>interest or their collective judgment that such-and-such is boring and
>>unimportant -- if these things guide us past certain subjects or deter us
>>from discussing them in class, then we might just as well skip over
>>Reconstruction, too, and that milquetoast-y fellow Woodrow Wilson, and lord
>>knows what else. For what it's worth.
>
>Let's hear it for Arnold! The impeachment question is not a simple issue
>or something that we just have "to get through." When we do finally
>resolve this difficult question, we need to understand what we have done
>and why. I'd like to be a fly on the wall in your class, Arnold!
>
>
>

Yeh, the only reason I don't teach anthing is that it didn't make a
difference such as the type of hat Lincoln took to the show that night.

I *never* let the kids decide what's important because, by definitions, the
kids are ignorant! That's why they are in school. If they knew enough to
make a decision about importance, then I wouldn't be teaching them.

My job is to not only teach the material but present it in such a way that
*they* think its important and interesting.

That's the challenge and the fun.

Ron Stoloff

If the gods had intended man to fly they wouldn't have given us railroads.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 12:24:13 EST