Reform Song Rubric
Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality of work
|
Product is poorly prepared and presented. Product
is missing song title, lyrics, and cover sheet. Multiple spelling and mechanics
errors are evident. There is little evidence of effort.
|
Product is poorly prepared and presented. Product
is missing song title, lyrics, and / or cover sheet. Multiple spelling
and mechanics errors are evident. There is minimal evidence of effort.
|
Product is adequately prepared and presented. Product
may be missing one of the following: song title, lyrics, and cover sheet.
There are a few spelling and mechanics errors. There is some evidence of
effort.
|
Product is neatly prepared and presented. Product
includes song title, lyrics, and cover sheet. There are 1-2 spelling and
mechanics errors.
There is good evidence of effort.
|
Product is prepared and presented in a superior
way.Product includes song title, lyrics, and cover sheet. All spelling
and mechanics are correct. There is superior evidence of effort.
|
Content of song
|
Song does not reflect evidence of understanding
of reform. The song does not express a clear opinion about a reform topic.
The song does not include facts to support an opinion.
|
Song clearly reflects little evidence of understanding
of reform. The song does not express an opinion about a reform topic. The
song includes few facts to support the opinion.
|
Song reflects evidence of some understanding of
reform. The song expresses an opinion about a reform topic. The song includes
some facts to support the opinion.
|
Song clearly reflects evidence of understanding
of reform. The song expresses an opinion about a reform topic. The song
includes four facts to support the opinion..
|
Song clearly reflects evidence of understanding
of reform.The song expresses a clear opinion about a reform topic. The
song includes four strong facts to support the opinion.
|
Use of American Memory collections
|
Mind map is missing. Analysis of a reform song from
the website is missing. An image is present but not from the website.
|
Mind map is not complete.Analysis of a reform song
from the website is not done. An image from the website is not on the cover
sheet.
|
Mind map is incomplete. Analysis of a reform song
from the website is not completely done. An image from the website is on
the cover sheet.
|
Mind map is incomplete. Analysis of a reform song
from the website is complete. An image from the website is on the cover
sheet.
|
Mind map is completely filled out. Analysis
of a reform song from the website is complete and the song from the website
is attached. An image from the American Memory website is on the
cover sheet.
|
Group Work
|
There is no evidence that all members contributed
to this project.
|
There is little evidence that all members contributed
to this project.
|
There is minimal evidence that all members contributed
to this project.
|
There is good evidence that all members contributed
to this project.
|
There is superior evidence that all members contributed
to this project.
|
Group Presentation
|
Group presentation is poor. All group members did
not participate. Students did not make eye contact and lyrics could not
be understood.
|
Group presentation is fair. Students did not make
eye contact and words were hard to understand.
|
Group presentation is average. Students made limited
eye contact and words were hard to understand.
|
Group presentation is good. Students faced audience
and spoke clearly.
|
Group presentation is superior. Students faced the
audience and sang the song clearly.
|
Grading Calculation
|
|
|
Quality
|
|
|
Content
|
|
|
Use of American
Memory Collection
|
|
|
Group Work
|
|
|
Presentation
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: